Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chaining reduce produces different results than static method. #17

Closed
jdalton opened this issue Apr 29, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

chaining reduce produces different results than static method. #17

jdalton opened this issue Apr 29, 2015 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@jdalton
Copy link

jdalton commented Apr 29, 2015

I noticed the chaining reduce is one off of the non-chaining version. For reference see the current micro-benchmark we've discussed.

@astoilkov
Copy link
Owner

Yes. Thanks. I will look at it.

@astoilkov astoilkov added the bug label May 4, 2015
@astoilkov astoilkov self-assigned this May 4, 2015
@astoilkov astoilkov added this to the 0.4.0 milestone Jun 6, 2015
@astoilkov
Copy link
Owner

I have created a separate issue for removing the utility methods from jsblocks and leave the work to libraries like lodash and underscore. I am closing this one and copying the issue to the jsvalue repo (which is currently private repository).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants