Replies: 2 comments 6 replies
-
Do you mean in a subschema resolver? That the info argument should have a different path cognizant of the gateway? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Not saying it necessarily should, but being able to retrieve the full
gateway schema path to the resolver within the subschemas resolver function
is the problem I am trying to solve at the moment, yes! Was curious to see
if there would be any sane way to do it.
tis 11 maj 2021 kl. 18:23 skrev Yaacov Rydzinski ***@***.***>:
… Do you mean in a subschema resolver? That the info argument should have a
different path cognizant of the gateway?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2946 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAI7Q7PRIKLNJZP5EQS2A7TTNFKWVANCNFSM44VYBDPQ>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
6 replies
Answer selected by
ardatan
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello!
In a stitching model with several local subschemas, and given a query that traverses multiple layers of delegation, as such -
path
will naturally resolve to_b.path
(without batch loading). Is there any way to make it resolve toa.b.c.path
, or any other reasonable way to pass on the full path of a specific field from the gateway schema to subschema resolvers?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions