-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WMRC: Used Oil Collection Center (UOCC) Inspection Report Automation #428
Comments
We need to find out if the state have an enterprise account for Make or at least an approval to use it? We pay for IFTTT already if that could be used although DTS has asked us not to increase our use of it. |
Sprint 4
|
25.1.5Met with Ted Sonnenberg, Rachel Boyer, and Stevie on 5 Sept to discuss next steps. GoalS123 form that will provide a different list of inspectors (from feature service) and UOCCs (from feature service) based on LHD. Gateway condition will be a code that each LHD has. S123 and all supporting data will be public. After a response is submitted, a Make workflow will generate a PDF report and save it to a Google Drive folder based on the LHD. If possible, it will also look for a "email me a copy" question and if yes, send a copy of the PDF to the email address provided by the UOCC. The Make workflow will also save the data in a google sheet, with a separate tab for each LHD if possible. Tasks
|
25.1.6WMRC shuffled funds around and removed the end-of-September deadline. Now this can be finished in early Q2. |
25.2.1Started working on S123 copy over |
25.2.3Fighting with S123 Connect and LibreOffice not being able to update the XLSForm document. |
25.2.4Meeting with WMRC folks on UOCC stuff on 4 Dec |
Benefit
An automated system using Survey123, webhooks, and Make will speed up the UOCC inspection process and make sure reports are both being saved to the right locations and go out to relevant parties immediately. Will allow WMRC to get rid of paper form process.
Acceptance Criteria
Notes
One of the Local Health Departments (LHDs) has already done a proof of concept, we just need to implement it statewide.
Risks
Issue Reference
refs #
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: