-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Exclude private/internal functions defined in a different file from auto-complete suggestions #50
Comments
Do you think this is generally applicable? Since there is no internal function concept in q, it's really just a convention that may not be widely followed. Maybe we could add an additional checkbox (next to where the pattern for internal functions is defined) to control this behavior. What are your thoughts? |
Sure, makes sense
… On Nov 14, 2019, at 12:57 PM, Antonio Andrade ***@***.***> wrote:
Do you think this is generally applicable? Since there is no internal function concept in q, it's really just a convention that may not be widely followed. Maybe we could add an additional checkbox (next to where the pattern for internal functions is defined) to control this behavior. What are your thoughts?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
I think 99% of users use |
99% of the users is a bit of a bold claim :)
…On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:10 PM Wi ***@***.***> wrote:
I think 99% of users use .i. as private.
QPad for example shows such functions as private.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#50 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKQHPENYIWUR4DDXGAUWUOTRSLYVVANCNFSM4JL52UKA>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
@a2ndrade - feature request. Currently autocomplete suggests matches from the entire project, including the ones flagged as private/internal. I think it would make sense to only include private/internal suggestions from the current file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: