You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Nice work on NEXTorch! Seems like a compelling idea, and some difficulty with implementing human-in-the-loop optimization via Ax is what led me here.
Something very important for my use-case is inequality constraints for composition-based Bayesian optimization (also prevalence-based, fractional-based, etc., i.e. everything needs to sum to 1). For example:
A+B+C<=1
where A, B, and C are parameters to be optimized.
For me, there would technically also be D, the final parameter is determined automatically outside of the optimization loop via:
D=1-sum([A, B, C])
In other words, safe to ignore D, but relevant for the context of a composition-based optimization.
Is it possible to specify an inequality constraint within the current implementation of NEXTorch?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Nice work on NEXTorch! Seems like a compelling idea, and some difficulty with implementing human-in-the-loop optimization via Ax is what led me here.
Something very important for my use-case is inequality constraints for composition-based Bayesian optimization (also prevalence-based, fractional-based, etc., i.e. everything needs to sum to
1
). For example:where
A
,B
, andC
are parameters to be optimized.For me, there would technically also be
D
, the final parameter is determined automatically outside of the optimization loop via:In other words, safe to ignore
D
, but relevant for the context of a composition-based optimization.Is it possible to specify an inequality constraint within the current implementation of NEXTorch?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: