You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don‘t know how the sidenote mark (in the margin column) is formatted in Tufte‘s books, but I‘d like to suggest to change it in the tufte class: There is actually no good reason for making the number of a footnote a superscript, be it in the margin column or in the foot. When using normal footnotes in other classes I set it in normalsize, bold and with a small but distinct gap between it and the text, as suggested by another well-known typographer, Hans Peter Willberg. In the tufte class I wouldn‘t set the number bold, maybe.
Maybe I can find an image I can show here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I don‘t know how the sidenote mark (in the margin column) is formatted in Tufte‘s books, but I‘d like to suggest to change it in the tufte class: There is actually no good reason for making the number of a footnote a superscript, be it in the margin column or in the foot. When using normal footnotes in other classes I set it in normalsize, bold and with a small but distinct gap between it and the text, as suggested by another well-known typographer, Hans Peter Willberg. In the tufte class I wouldn‘t set the number bold, maybe.
Maybe I can find an image I can show here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: