[enhancement] Sanity checking H/r_p for user-specified global linear perturbations

[TomHilder]

Quoted from PR #21 :

Tom: I feel there needs to be a further sanity-check/warning in the case that the user is providing either global or simulation perturbations. H/r_p needs to be identical in the provided data and as specified to wakeflow no? It would be good to really reinforce this to the user (obviously we can't actually check the H/r_p in the linear perturbations they provide).

Daniele: Actually we could do something about it, maybe we can work on this together when you are in nice. Andrés is parsing the log files in discminer, checking if they are compliant with the standard nomenclature. We could change the names of the perturbations accounting for the different parameters and parse the name of the files, checking if H/r_p is actually the same