You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your excellent work. I read the code carefully. And I notice that when calculating the CE loss and the miou, the class 0 seems to be ignored, why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Class 0 is the void class that indicates an invalid pixel or a missing annotation (for the datasets we consider). Thus, pixels of the void class should be ignored during loss and metric calculation.
Note that our semantic head also does not predict this class, it can only occur after panoptic merging in predictions (if --instance-offset-distance-threshold is used).
Thanks for your excellent work. I read the code carefully. And I notice that when calculating the CE loss and the miou, the class 0 seems to be ignored, why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: