Nested ternaries

[Arthurvdv]

An interesting discussion on X/Twitter on the new ternary operator in Business Central v25.

Unsure of this is feasible, but a diagnostic on nested ternaries in the context of (un)readable code.

[rvanbekkum]

As in, avoid nested ternaries completely? Or, a warning for nested ternaries starting from a certain 'nesting level' (with a setting in LinterCop.json)?
I think you should avoid a nested ternary operator completely, but I can also imagine that others have a different opinion on that, so it should be good to take that into account.

[Arthurvdv]

Currently I would opt for “.. avoid nested ternaries complete….”, but it’s a bit early to already decide right now. I wanted to create the discussion here, while I still had de link to the twitter thread.

[Arthurvdv]

The Dark Side of Ternary Operator
(gathering more content here, now the discussion on this is on topic)