Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
This is already available with the searchable Read Lexion. I don't think I have 𐑐𐑹 as an alternative spelling for "poor", though. I do have to be selective about alternative spellings given I could add tens of thousands for months or years on end of them without ever truly expanding the Lexicon, which seems like a waste of time. But maybe the CURE lexical set deserves a bit of attention given how unstable it is. EDIT: Also, the raw data for the ReadLex is script neutral, if you look at readLex.json (which is the file from which all other forms are derived). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm not sure if we would need a new dictionary, but the idea is, if someone searches "𐑐𐑹", it could show both "pore" and "poor". And if someone searches "𐑐𐑫𐑼", it could show just "poor".
Theoretically, in such a dictionary, we could allow for more varied Shavian spellings of words to link to the same Latin words. Because it would use Shavian as the primary column instead of Latin.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions