Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make rewind navigation more intuitive #175

Open
SnippetSpace opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Make rewind navigation more intuitive #175

SnippetSpace opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
priority:low Low priority type:enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@SnippetSpace
Copy link

Description

currently the UI for advancing on the rewind page is to click on the right side of the card.
This is not especially intuitive.

It took me a second to figure out how to navigate, and my first instinct was to press to progress bar with no result.

Desired behavior

I would suggest adding additional navigation cues:

  1. Back / forward arrows next to the play icon
  2. clicking on a section of the progress bar at the top should move to that section

Additional context

No response

@SnippetSpace SnippetSpace added awaiting triage Awaiting preliminary assessment type:enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 24, 2024
@RaunoT RaunoT added priority:low Low priority and removed awaiting triage Awaiting preliminary assessment labels Jul 24, 2024
@RaunoT RaunoT added priority:maybe-someday Lowest priority, requires further consideration and removed priority:low Low priority labels Aug 6, 2024
@RaunoT RaunoT added priority:low Low priority and removed priority:maybe-someday Lowest priority, requires further consideration labels Aug 23, 2024
@RaunoT RaunoT changed the title Make rewind navigation more intuitive. Make rewind navigation more intuitive Sep 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority:low Low priority type:enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants