Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Excitations, data and simulation over 500 kHz? #71

Open
GuilleMaese opened this issue Mar 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Excitations, data and simulation over 500 kHz? #71

GuilleMaese opened this issue Mar 21, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@GuilleMaese
Copy link

Dear team,

I can see now that all the database, as well as the options you provide, only allows a frequency range from 50 to 500 kHz.

Nevertheless, many applications require frequencies over 500 kHz.

Are you planning to extend your tool for frequencies over 500 kHz (for those materials that can operate over this frequency) ?

Thank you very much!! Keep up the good work.

@ds9056
Copy link
Collaborator

ds9056 commented Apr 5, 2022

Thank you for your interest one more time GuilleMaese.
We are aware that 500 kHz might be too low for certain applications. However, with the measurement system that we are using, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data at very high frequencies, especially for materials with low losses. The problem is we calculate core losses based on direct voltage and current measurements, a technique highly sensitive to delays. Any delay between the voltage and current measurement would be interpreted as losses, and this effect has a larger impact at higher frequencies for any given time delay. We are not planning to change the setup for the measurements; this one does not require hardware changes when measuring different operation points, making it very well suited for automation.
To sum up, to ensure that the quality of the data is maintained, we do not plan to increase the frequency. We will update the FAQ section to clarify this limitation.

@GuilleMaese
Copy link
Author

GuilleMaese commented Apr 6, 2022 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants