Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Container size #36

Open
elmero1 opened this issue Apr 27, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Container size #36

elmero1 opened this issue Apr 27, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@elmero1
Copy link

elmero1 commented Apr 27, 2019

Hi,
I use your container and it works great. But when i compare your container size to other jdownloader container, then is yours much bigger (976MB). Is there a reason for that? Maybe you can use another base image?
Thanks.

@PlusMinus0
Copy link
Owner

You could use the alpine tag if size matters to you. Does it though? Unless you spawn multiple instances the size difference does not really matter, at least imo.

One caveat of the alpine build is that jd2 crashes when extracting and I didn't feel recompiling the bad library for alpine.

Also, according to docker hub, image size is 400MB vs 125MB. Everything else might be jd2.

Cheers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants