You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I use your container and it works great. But when i compare your container size to other jdownloader container, then is yours much bigger (976MB). Is there a reason for that? Maybe you can use another base image?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You could use the alpine tag if size matters to you. Does it though? Unless you spawn multiple instances the size difference does not really matter, at least imo.
One caveat of the alpine build is that jd2 crashes when extracting and I didn't feel recompiling the bad library for alpine.
Also, according to docker hub, image size is 400MB vs 125MB. Everything else might be jd2.
Hi,
I use your container and it works great. But when i compare your container size to other jdownloader container, then is yours much bigger (976MB). Is there a reason for that? Maybe you can use another base image?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: