Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update OpenEnergyFamily overview picture #78

Open
jh-RLI opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Update OpenEnergyFamily overview picture #78

jh-RLI opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jh-RLI
Copy link
Contributor

jh-RLI commented Nov 7, 2023

https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/organisation/blob/production/logo/OpenEnergyFamily_FamilyGroupPicture.png

The scenario bundles & comparison is missing. Also on the oep website we use the same icon for the scenario bundles as we use for the oedatamodel. We should update this.

@christian-rli @bmlancien

Edit:
Maybe we should even replace the factsheet with scenario bundles?

@jh-RLI
Copy link
Contributor Author

jh-RLI commented Nov 7, 2023

We should also use "WEB-API" instead of "API"

@bmlancien
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe we should even replace the factsheet with scenario bundles?

Easier would be to do this, indeed:

2023_11_08_OEFamily

@jh-RLI
Copy link
Contributor Author

jh-RLI commented Nov 8, 2023

What do you think, should we show the factsheets explicitly in this overview picture or is it okay to hide them "behind" the scenario bundle?
@han-f @christian-rli @wingechr @stap-m @l-emele @adelmemariani

@han-f
Copy link
Contributor

han-f commented Nov 9, 2023

I think scenario bundles is good to show and I would personally "hide" the other factsheets behind them to give the bundles more visibility.

@stap-m
Copy link
Contributor

stap-m commented Nov 9, 2023

At some point, maybe at the end of the project, we could think about a separate icon for the comparison. But for now, I am fine with that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants