-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add model system boundary
#1951
Comments
Maybe adding the proposed definition here would be good. This is the current draft from @LillyG901
|
is the definiton given within the paper |
I like the definition proposed. |
I like the proposed definition too. It seems to capture everything necessary. |
During a discussion with @stap-m and @ColinHDev it was suggested to change the term to |
If there are no further comments on this proposal, I would open a PR to add:
after PR #1945 has been merged. |
Description of the issue
The ontology currently contains
system
as a term, but no way to explicitly reference the boundary that separates it from the rest of the real world. This is a term needed for modeling uncertainties, more specifically the location of an uncertainty within a model (that models the system).See issue #1829.
Ideas of solution
The term should be defined similarly to how it is described within this paper to properly work in the needed context. The class should be related to system.
Workflow checklist
I am aware that
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: