Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reward pick: Choose correct gear coffers #22

Open
KalasB opened this issue Jan 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Reward pick: Choose correct gear coffers #22

KalasB opened this issue Jan 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Investigation This feature is undergoing investigation whether it's possible and feasible to implement

Comments

@KalasB
Copy link

KalasB commented Jan 14, 2024

Currently, coffer picks appear to be random. Is it possible to support picking the correct gear sets, e.g. coffers that say "... of fending/casting" etc.?

@Limiana
Copy link
Collaborator

Limiana commented Feb 15, 2024

Hello! To my knowledge you just need to open the coffer on a class for which you want to receive gear, it will adjust it's loot. Is it not like that?

@KalasB
Copy link
Author

KalasB commented Feb 16, 2024

Hi! This is true for only some coffers from EW and onwards as far as I know. ShB and older coffers as well as accessory coffers come with a selection according to your role. Examples include the Primal Accessories of Fending Coffer (IL240), Dai-ryumyaku Armor of Fending Coffer (IL 370) and Crystarium Gear of Fending Coffer (IL 500). All of these are given in the MSQ, and TA will currently select them not based on your role. You are given the choice when accepting rewards, they do not adjust to your current job.

@Limiana Limiana added the Investigation This feature is undergoing investigation whether it's possible and feasible to implement label Mar 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Investigation This feature is undergoing investigation whether it's possible and feasible to implement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants