Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Grading Criteria #20

Open
sampan501 opened this issue Apr 19, 2021 · 10 comments
Open

Grading Criteria #20

sampan501 opened this issue Apr 19, 2021 · 10 comments

Comments

@sampan501
Copy link
Member

I think that when we develop the course next year, we should have clear grading criteria that are completely transparent to the students. This lets them know where they are in the course and makes our grading the students a bit easier. Here is my proposal:

  • Miss:
    • 1 week: A-
    • 2 weeks: B
    • 3 weeks: C
    • 4 weeks: F
    • If can’t make it to class and TA agrees to meet outside of class, doesn’t count as a miss
  • Completed PR is 50% of grade
  • Passing is missing less than 4 weeks and a completed PR

Any thoughts? @jovo @bdpedigo @v715 @ tathey1 @ jdey4

@eigenvivek
Copy link

It should be possible for people to get +/- grades. Maybe a + should be added for truly exceptional work.

  • No miss + completed PR + exceptional work = A+
  • 1 miss + completed PR + exceptional work = A
  • 2 miss + completed PR + exceptional work = B+

@bdpedigo
Copy link
Contributor

ya, definitely think missing a week and getting an A should be possible

@jovo
Copy link
Member

jovo commented Apr 20, 2021

no A-?

@eigenvivek
Copy link

under sambit's scheme, you can earn a A- if you miss 1 class and merge ur PR.

similar to giving a + for exceptional work, we could give a - for subpar work (not sure why a subpar PR would be merged tho). i don't like this because it feels too subjective.

@sampan501
Copy link
Member Author

no A-?

1 miss + completed PR + not exceptional work = A-

@jovo
Copy link
Member

jovo commented Apr 23, 2021

'exceptional work' is too subjective?
let's see: everybody write down who you think is doing exceptional work, and then once we all have written it down, we can share with one another?

@sampan501
Copy link
Member Author

also, are we giving an incomplete for students who don't meet the requirements, or just an F if they don't finish by the end of the semester? Not sure if there is some kind of university policy for this

@jovo
Copy link
Member

jovo commented Apr 26, 2021

F unless they make arrangements with us (that we agree to) to make up all the missed work.
that said, they should be working on teams, so unless the team is continuing, making up for missed work is a bit fake.

@eigenvivek
Copy link

eigenvivek commented Apr 27, 2021

@sampan501 and i were discussing tagging some issues as exceptional or high-priority. if students successfully merge those, they could earn the +. a way of making "exceptional work" less subjective.

it's more rigorous, but personally i dont like it bc there's a limited number of opportunities for students to get the +. anyone have improvement ideas.

@jovo
Copy link
Member

jovo commented May 4, 2021

i'm cool with subjective.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants