-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Possible underflow #15
Comments
Hi, thank you for reporting the issue! I could confirm your answer with the DC-SSAT solver: $ bin/dcssat test/test-cases/benchmarks/er-random-k-CNF/rand-3-30-150-15.57.sdimacs
x16 -x17 x18 x19 x20 x21 x22 -x23 -x24 x25 x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30 x1 x2 x3 x4 -x5 x6 x8 -x9 x10 -x11 -x13 x14 x15
solve time: = 0.00270891
rebuild/print time: = 8.2016e-05
total time: = 0.00279093
Pr[SAT] = 2.04728e-05 This issue is most likely related to #3. abc 01> ssat -gv test/test-cases/benchmarks/er-random-k-CNF/rand-3-30-150-15.57.sdimacs
[INFO] Input sdimacs file: test/test-cases/benchmarks/er-random-k-CNF/rand-3-30-150-15.57.sdimacs
[INFO] Invoking erSSAT solver with the following configuration:
> Counting engine: BDD
> Minimal clause selection (greedy): no
> Clause subsumption (subsume): yes
> Partial assignment pruning (partial): yes
[INFO] Starting analysis ...
> Found a better solution , value = 0.000021
16 -17 18 19 20 21 22 -23 -24 25 26 -27 -28 -29 -30 0
> Time consumed = 0.00 sec
[INFO] Stopping analysis ...
> Found an optimizing assignment to exist vars:
16 -17 18 19 20 21 22 -23 -24 25 26 -27 -28 -29 -30 0
==== Solving results ====
> Satisfying probability: 2.050400e-05
> Time = 0.00 sec |
@vuphan314: Could you please let me know if it is fine to close this issue? I have mentioned this test case |
Thank you. I will use |
@nianzelee
Could you check if erSSAT experiences underflow for this benchmark?
My (currently unpublished) solver returns
2.04728e-05
.Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: