You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Functionality: Have the functional claims of the software been confirmed?
Performance: If there are any performance claims of the software, have they been confirmed? (If there are no claims, please check off this item.)
On it, can you improve the doc regarding how models are supposed to perform? I ran a few files with omnizart music transcribe and realized for typical multi-instrument pop music, the performance might be under general expectation people would have.
Also, I found "music" to be a little too general. Shall we instead say it like "harmonic part", "tonal instruments", etc, and specify that the output would be a single-track midi file?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(openjournals/joss-reviews#3391)
In the review checklist, we have this item
On it, can you improve the doc regarding how models are supposed to perform? I ran a few files with
omnizart music transcribe
and realized for typical multi-instrument pop music, the performance might be under general expectation people would have.Also, I found "music" to be a little too general. Shall we instead say it like "harmonic part", "tonal instruments", etc, and specify that the output would be a single-track midi file?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: