Are only Findings used in reports in the IU-Xray dataset

[siuuu7u]

Dear author, I hope this message finds you well. I have been reviewing your recent project that incorporates the IU-Xray dataset, and I am particularly intrigued by your data selection process. My query pertains to the specific parts of the dataset utilized in your analysis. Could you kindly confirm if your study exclusively employed the 'Findings' section from the reports within the IU-Xray dataset, while omitting the 'Impression' segment? I am eager to understand this aspect of your methodology as it holds significant implications for my own research endeavors. Your clarification would be immensely appreciated.

[Markin-Wang]

Dear author, I hope this message finds you well. I have been reviewing your recent project that incorporates the IU-Xray dataset, and I am particularly intrigued by your data selection process. My query pertains to the specific parts of the dataset utilized in your analysis. Could you kindly confirm if your study exclusively employed the 'Findings' section from the reports within the IU-Xray dataset, while omitting the 'Impression' segment? I am eager to understand this aspect of your methodology as it holds significant implications for my own research endeavors. Your clarification would be immensely appreciated.

Thank you for your interest to our work. We follow the same way as R2GenCM to form the reports. Relevant statement from the R2GenCMN paper: "we only generate the findings section and exclude the samples without the findings section for both datasets." Therefore, yes, only findings section is used in reports. Hope this could help you figure out the problem.

[siuuu7u]

Thank you very much for your answer. I have another question: there are 14 categories of pseudo-labels in the article. Could you please disclose the specific category represented by each column