Typo in 2.2?

[elenlefoll]

I think some words are missing in this sentence in Section 2.2:

"At the same time, the alpha of 5% guarantees that (in the long-run) 5% of the 100 studies where the null hypothesis is true will Type 1 errors: 5% = 5."

Also, "long run" in usually written as two words in the phrase "in the long run" (this applies throughout this chapter).

[elenlefoll]

For consistency, the following sentence could also have the proportion expressed as a percentage:

"When we do 200 studies, at most 0.05 = 10 could possibly be false positives (if was true in all experiments)."

Instead of 0.05, I suggest writing 5% to better connect to the previous sentence and avoid the mathematically odd statement of "0.05 = 10".