Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch from base_ to slot_ where possible #206

Open
wmwv opened this issue Oct 5, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Switch from base_ to slot_ where possible #206

wmwv opened this issue Oct 5, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
dpdd-catalog Issues related to DPDD-like catalogs priority:low reader Issues related to reader modules

Comments

@wmwv
Copy link
Contributor

wmwv commented Oct 5, 2018

After discussion with the LSST DM DRP team, I have a clearer view that slot_ is what is supposed to always be there. base_ is how it was done. We in general should use slot_ columns when preparing the Object table. There were some measurements missing in Run 1.1 which meant we didn't do this.

  1. Take another look at the existing Run 1.1p translations to see what can be done with slot_
  2. Check Run 1.2p processing to make sure the slot_ columns are all filled in now.
@wmwv wmwv self-assigned this Oct 5, 2018
@yymao yymao added the reader Issues related to reader modules label Oct 5, 2018
@wmwv wmwv added run1.2 and removed run1.2 labels Oct 15, 2018
@yymao yymao modified the milestone: hackuDC2-start Oct 16, 2018
@yymao yymao added the dpdd-catalog Issues related to DPDD-like catalogs label Nov 19, 2018
@yymao yymao removed the run1.2 label Nov 30, 2018
@yymao
Copy link
Member

yymao commented Jan 29, 2020

@wmwv Is this issue still relevant? If not we should close it. If it is still relevant, feel free to change the priority (I am currently assigning it a low priority).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dpdd-catalog Issues related to DPDD-like catalogs priority:low reader Issues related to reader modules
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants