-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: Allow coef and p-value extraction by variable name #491
Comments
I guess in addition to directly delegating coef(model, term) = coef(model)[findfirst(==(term), coefnames(model))]
model = fit(Whatever, @formula(y ~ 1 + x), data)
coef(model, :x) # coefficient for `x` That could only sensibly support table-based models though, since those are the only ones for which you know the coefficient names. (e.g. this wouldn't work for models fit with an explicit design matrix rather than a formula) |
This should be added or at least documented. |
I think we should consider if we can do something here before releasing 2.0. The raw vectors without any context aren't that helpful |
How do you mean? Like I guess it could be convenient for |
Costless abstractions and all that. Hopefully we can have both. I just think it's really error prone not to have some kind of label associating an estimate in a vector with a parameter name or an effect name. That being said, I'm not sure what the right implementation would look like. |
Hi,
It would be great (and safer?) if one could extract coeffecients by variable names:
Or really any thing like that.
See e.g., https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-to-obtain-the-pvalues-of-the-coefficients-in-glm-jl/9531/4
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: