We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, the OML concrete syntax involves a lot of repetition.
For example:
open terminology <http://example.org/foo> { ... concept A A extendsConcept B A extendsConcept C A extendsConcept D }
A Turtle-like syntax could help avoid repeating the concept like this:
open terminology <http://example.org/foo> { ... concept A [ extendsConcept B extendsConcept C extendsConcept D ] }
Note that it is important to retain the possibility of both syntaxes since OML statements can be asserted individually; for example:
open terminology <http://example.org/foo> { ... concept A [ extendsConcept B extendsConcept C ] }
open terminology <http://example.org/bar> { extends <http://example.org/foo> A extendsConcept D }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Currently, the OML concrete syntax involves a lot of repetition.
For example:
A Turtle-like syntax could help avoid repeating the concept like this:
Note that it is important to retain the possibility of both syntaxes since OML statements can be asserted individually; for example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: