Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

TRUTH.TOTAL differs despite having used the same TRUTH SET #165

Open
robertzeibich opened this issue Oct 20, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

TRUTH.TOTAL differs despite having used the same TRUTH SET #165

robertzeibich opened this issue Oct 20, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@robertzeibich
Copy link

robertzeibich commented Oct 20, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Do you know why the TRUTH.TOTAL differs despite having used the same TRUTH SET?

hap py output
@shinlin77
Copy link

Yes, I have that same question.

@janoppelt
Copy link

janoppelt commented Mar 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Same here. I tried:

  1. Run full GiaB HG002 (AshkenazimTrio/HG002_NA24385_son/NISTv4.2.1/GRCh38) as both the truth and the sample
  2. Run full GiaB HG002 (AshkenazimTrio/HG002_NA24385_son/NISTv4.2.1/GRCh38) as the truth and HG002 subset (1000 variants) as the sample.

I got a different TRUTH.TOTAL counts in the summary. However, the number of annotated variants in hap.py annotated output VCF is the same and is equal to the second test (full sample as the truth and subset as the sample).

However, it seems to apply only for vcfeval engine. With xcmp it seems to report the same numbers.

@zeeev
Copy link

zeeev commented Aug 12, 2024

bump, same issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@zeeev @janoppelt @shinlin77 @robertzeibich