Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatibility with GeometryBasics? #401

Open
Codyk12 opened this issue Jun 26, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Compatibility with GeometryBasics? #401

Codyk12 opened this issue Jun 26, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@Codyk12
Copy link

Codyk12 commented Jun 26, 2020

Has there been any thought on making this package work with GeometryBasics types? It would provide a more consistent and cohesive ecosystem for creating shapes and being able to draw them.

@bjarthur
Copy link
Member

bjarthur commented Aug 1, 2020

first i heard of geometrybasics.jl. can you elaborate on the benefits of adding that as a dependency?

@Codyk12
Copy link
Author

Codyk12 commented Aug 1, 2020

It’s the new attempt to unify geometry types. For almost every drawing library geometry types are redefined, we started making our own for the library were making, but realized it might be more beneficial to use another library to handle geometry types(we would like to probably use compose to draw images). If the geometry types were the same it would be easier to use one standard geometry set of types. It’s still somewhat new trying to address this problem, so I thought I’d bring it up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants