You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Has there been any thought on making this package work with GeometryBasics types? It would provide a more consistent and cohesive ecosystem for creating shapes and being able to draw them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It’s the new attempt to unify geometry types. For almost every drawing library geometry types are redefined, we started making our own for the library were making, but realized it might be more beneficial to use another library to handle geometry types(we would like to probably use compose to draw images). If the geometry types were the same it would be easier to use one standard geometry set of types. It’s still somewhat new trying to address this problem, so I thought I’d bring it up.
Has there been any thought on making this package work with GeometryBasics types? It would provide a more consistent and cohesive ecosystem for creating shapes and being able to draw them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: