You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
f=$(ls ${DATADIR}/PRODEM/PRODEM??.tif | head -n1) # debug
for f in $(ls ${DATADIR}/PRODEM/PRODEM??.tif); do
y=20$(echo ${f: -6:2})
r.in.gdal -r input=${f} output=DEM_${y} band=1
# r.in.gdal -r input=${f} output=var_${y} band=2
# r.in.gdal -r input=${f} output=dh_${y} band=3
# r.in.gdal -r input=${f} output=time_${y} band=4
# r.univar -g time_2019 # mean = DOI 213 = 01 Aug
done
g.region raster=DEM_2019 -pa
#+END_SRC
Currently PRODEMs are assumed to be tied to the median date (August 1). This should be improved by using the date associated with each pixel. Lining up the dates between the earliest PRODEM and the earlier Khan DEMs should also be done more carefully.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ice_discharge/ice_discharge.org
Lines 1687 to 1705 in bb87ab6
Currently PRODEMs are assumed to be tied to the median date (August 1). This should be improved by using the date associated with each pixel. Lining up the dates between the earliest PRODEM and the earlier Khan DEMs should also be done more carefully.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: