Data mining is widely used to identify patterns and anomalies in large datasets, with financial documents serving as a crucial source for businesses. Extracting financial information correctly and efficiently is vital to prevent data forgery and identify significant issues in business activities. Tables are a primary format for presenting key figures in financial documents, but their style and format can vary, making table recognition a critical step in financial data forgery prevention. While academic and commercial approaches exist to recognize tables in various document formats, there is limited work on image-based table recognition in real-world scenarios, with limited training data being the main technical challenge.
The proposed challenge aims to explore the latest techniques for recognizing table structures in real financial documents and focuses on identifying the row and column count of tables from an image of a financial document.
- *CODE means official code and CODE means not official code
Dataset | Description | dataset link |
---|---|---|
TableBank | English TableBank is a new image-based table detection and recognition dataset built with novel weak supervision from Word and Latex documents on the internet, contains 417K high-quality labeled tables.It only contain cell Topology groudtruth | TableBank |
SciTSR | *English SciTSR is a large-scale table structure recognition dataset, which contains 15,000 tables in PDF format and their corresponding structure labels obtained from LaTeX source files.It contain cell Topology, cell content groudtruth | SciTSR |
PubTabNet | English PubTabNet is a large dataset for image-based table recognition, containing 568k+ images of tabular data annotated with the corresponding HTML representation of the tables.It contain cell Topology, cell content and non-blank cell location groudtruth | PubTabNet |
FinTabNet | English This dataset contains complex tables from the annual reports of S&P 500 companies with detailed table structure annotations to help train and test structure recognition. | FinTabNet |
PubTables-1M | English A large, detailed, high-quality dataset for training and evaluating a wide variety of models for the tasks of table detection, table structure recognition, and functional analysis. | PubTables-1M |
WTW | English and Chinese WTW-Dataset is the first wild table dataset for table detection and table structure recongnition tasks, which is constructed from photoing, scanning and web pages, covers 7 challenging cases like: (1)Inclined tables, (2) Curved tables, (3) Occluded tables or blurredtables (4) Extreme aspect ratio tables (5) Overlaid tables, (6) Multi-color tables and (7) Irregular tables in table structure recognition.It contain cell Topology, all cell location groudtruth | WTW |
TNCR | English a new table dataset with varying image quality collected from open access websites.TNCR contains 9428 labeled tables with approximately 6621 images.their classification into 5 different classes(Full Lined,Merged Cells,No lines,Partial Lined,Partial Lined Merged Cells). | TNCR |
TAL_OCR_TABLE | Chinese TAL_OCR_TABLE dataset come from TAL Form Recognition Technology Challenge.The data of comes from the real homework of students in the education scene and the scene of the test paper. It contain 16k train image and 4k test imageIt contain cell Topology, cell content and all cell location groudtruth | TAL_OCR_TABLE |
Dataset | Cell Topology | Cell content | Cell Location | Table Location |
---|---|---|---|---|
TableBank | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
SciTSR | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
PubTabNet | ✓ | ✓ | ✓† | ✓ |
FinTabNet | ✓ | ✓ | ✓† | ✓ |
PubTables-1M | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
WTW | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
TNCR | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
TAL_OCR_TABLE | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
† For these datasets, cell bounding boxes are given for non-blank cells only and exclude any non-text portion of a cell.
-
For Evaluation We considered Three Models:-
- CascadeTabNet
- Multi-Type-TD-TSR
- TGRNet
The Detailed report of the work can be found here.
- The aforementioned pre-trained models were tested on
TableGraph24k
that was unfamiliar to each model to assess their capabilities in predicting bounding borders and extracting structures. The results for all the three types can be seen here.