Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison to Hangfire #9

Open
lvmajor opened this issue Oct 2, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Comparison to Hangfire #9

lvmajor opened this issue Oct 2, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@lvmajor
Copy link

lvmajor commented Oct 2, 2018

Hey there, just wanted to know if there was a quick comparison between Minion and Hangfire.

Is it built to replace Hangfire at all?

thanks in advance :)

@timiskhakov
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, I took a liberty to answer your question since @pug-pelle-p is not active here. At this moment there is no a comparison table (or something like that) between Minion and Hangfire. The project is still in 0.0.x, so it's not as mature and robust as Hangfire is. For the same reason I would not recommend replacing Hangfire with Minion in production right now :)

@pug-pelle-p
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @os1r1s110, yes it's built to replace Hangfire. Hangfire is a great library, but it has no good support for running integration tests/simulations that are date-dependent.

The main reason I built this is to be able to run my application in a simulation mode, where I can simulate my application running for x days without actually running it for that long. An example where that would be a good idea is when I need to schedule email in 2 days and be able to test that the email actually sends in 2 days. Or simulate a loan being repaid over a long period of time.

For now this is a very basic library but I plan to add more features such as a dashboard.

@lvmajor
Copy link
Author

lvmajor commented Jan 10, 2019

All right, good to know. And do you plan splitting features such as what is done with hangfire and providing some free features and some premium paid features?

@pug-pelle-p
Copy link
Contributor

No there is no plan to split features into free/paid

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants