Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Requirement: Move key, selected blockette details into fixed header #18

Open
krischer opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 11 comments
Open

Requirement: Move key, selected blockette details into fixed header #18

krischer opened this issue Jan 3, 2018 · 11 comments
Labels
additional requirement simplification/reorganization

Comments

@krischer
Copy link
Contributor

krischer commented Jan 3, 2018

Simplification of MiniSEED2: Move key, selected blockette details (e.g. actual sample rate, data payload encoding) into fixed header.
@andres-h andres-h mentioned this issue Jan 8, 2018
Open
@crotwell
Copy link

crotwell commented Jan 8, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Also byte order if it is not fixed by #19 .

@krischer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Summary

(Please let me know if I missed a point or misunderstood something)

I assume this requires no discussion but please vote on:

  1. Should the above mentioned key fields be moved into the fixed header? (Yes/No)

@crotwell
Copy link

yes!!!

@ketchum-usgs
Copy link

yes, if a blockette was needed later and is commonly used, it should have been in the header.

@chad-earthscope
Copy link
Member

  1. Yes

@kaestli
Copy link

kaestli commented Jan 30, 2018

yes

@ozym
Copy link

ozym commented Jan 30, 2018

  1. Yes

@claudiodsf
Copy link

Yes!

@ihenson-bsl
Copy link

  1. Yes

2 similar comments
@ValleeMartin
Copy link

  1. Yes

@JoseAntonioJara
Copy link

  1. Yes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
additional requirement simplification/reorganization
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
10 participants
@crotwell @kaestli @krischer @claudiodsf @ozym @ketchum-usgs @chad-earthscope @JoseAntonioJara @ihenson-bsl @ValleeMartin