You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now it reads like there's just one cable-fiber ID for each portion of the fiber. Am I understanding that correctly?
As I'm working on an implementation of this in DASCore, I'm realizing it probably makes sense to keep a fiber ID and a cable ID for each portion of the light path.
Even though this may be redundant for some experiments, it's common enough to have a mix of straight stretches and loop-backs that I think it could help clarify acquisition setup for others after the fact.
A couple examples: This lets you leave a clear record when you start collecting data on a new fiber in the same cable. It also lets you have a clear indication of two fibers with a U connection at the end that sit in the same cable being differentiated from two fibers in two separate cables that are side-by-side or a cable deployed as a U. Or if you have a single mode DAS and a multimode DTS recording in the same cable (e.g. to do temp. corrections on your DAS data), and you use a similar metadata standard for DTS, then you can make it clear that they're in the same cable (and this means same thermal properties) versus side-by-side cables (potentially quite different thermal response).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Submitted by @EileenMartin
Right now it reads like there's just one cable-fiber ID for each portion of the fiber. Am I understanding that correctly?
As I'm working on an implementation of this in DASCore, I'm realizing it probably makes sense to keep a fiber ID and a cable ID for each portion of the light path.
Even though this may be redundant for some experiments, it's common enough to have a mix of straight stretches and loop-backs that I think it could help clarify acquisition setup for others after the fact.
A couple examples: This lets you leave a clear record when you start collecting data on a new fiber in the same cable. It also lets you have a clear indication of two fibers with a U connection at the end that sit in the same cable being differentiated from two fibers in two separate cables that are side-by-side or a cable deployed as a U. Or if you have a single mode DAS and a multimode DTS recording in the same cable (e.g. to do temp. corrections on your DAS data), and you use a similar metadata standard for DTS, then you can make it clear that they're in the same cable (and this means same thermal properties) versus side-by-side cables (potentially quite different thermal response).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: