Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FAIR Data needs FAIR tooling that is lightweight and ubiquitous #30

Open
CaroleGoble opened this issue Jul 31, 2017 · 2 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@CaroleGoble
Copy link

FAIR principles are all very well, but without the TOOLS for FAIR then its not possible to adopt. To make a "app eco system" of FAIR tools we need very small number of lightweight protocols and conventions, with real and adoptable, sustainable tooling.
This is not the time for monolithic systems.
Scruffy, lightweight, easy and ubiquitous ALWAYS beats out fancy, heavyweight, tricky and limited in my experience.

@CaroleGoble
Copy link
Author

We need FAIR on-Ramps to lift the burden on all data providers, including long tail
– Tools, governance, methods of working, costs
– Leveraging reality of practice (spreadsheets are ubiquitous and a great ramp)
– Leverage commercial and commodity Off the Shelf infrastructures (Bioschemas, Docker...)
– FAIR as a side-effect, removing friction

We should NOT build specialist bespoke infrastructures that are impossible to sustain. And we should not waste public money on such where few researchers or data providers really use it.

People are RAMPS too – FAIR curators. We had to do a great deal of curating to make data FAIR for the FAIRDOMHub.org.

@LeifLaaksonen
Copy link

How do you define now the difference between a tool and the (e-)infrastructure? I would have defined it rather from the (e-)infrastructure that includes a set of tools. However, there are still open questions as do we talk about a subset of an infrastructure or are we talking about (future) potential aggregations of infrastructures we currently are not even aware of?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants