You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Given that f1_score_micro is basically the same as accuracy for multi-class classification problems, is there a reason why we should continue to use that as the default tuning metric rather than just switching to accuracy? We can still continue to make f1_score_micro available as a metric in SKLL.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Given that
f1_score_micro
is basically the same asaccuracy
for multi-class classification problems, is there a reason why we should continue to use that as the default tuning metric rather than just switching toaccuracy
? We can still continue to makef1_score_micro
available as a metric in SKLL.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: