Governance discussion item: Sequencing of Board Officer transition

[aebudden]

With the current two year limit and annual elections, committees can experience significant turn over on an annual (or bi-annual) basis. Additionally, recruitment for leadership positions can be challenging. This issue speaks to discussion around the potential for a revised model. Examples that have been floated include Chair and chair elect scenarios, removal of the 2-year limit, extended service terms etc.

[relphj]

The Chair and Chair-elect model is a possibility, as is the Chair and Chair-Emeritus model. At the moment, the Governance Committee is effectively operating under the latter model, though informally of course.

However, both of these models would require a two-year commitment. Is that an issue for ESIP? Do we think it is that hard to get volunteers who would be unwilling to sign on for a two year tour?

Other notes from the discussion:

• Perhaps engage Committee Chairs and ex-Chairs
• Turnover is an issue for effectiveness and continuity of Committees
• Draft language would include analysis of impacts of proposed changes
• Would staggered longer terms help?
• Stagger by Type?
• Nomination Committee exists only for the short time needed to develop a slate
• Also need to consider President and Vice President
• Remember the impact to Program Committee
• ESIP is still an organization of Volunteers, but Committees are essential for the functioning of ESIP
• How to communicate importance of Committees and Committee membership to ESIP community? Topic in Business Meeting?

[relphj]

In the Governance Committee meeting on October 15, 2024, we discussed some other options including:

• Chair and Chair elect? Chair serves one year, Chair-elect shadows/assists that same year, then Chair-elect becomes Chair
• 2 year terms
• 1 year with option to renewal for 2nd year