You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 1, 2024. It is now read-only.
PRs that currently go to "Need Maintainer Review" can all be "blessed away" from it, making them (usually) go to "Waiting for Code Reviews". As another step towards more self-managing, it could instead do the following with these PRs:
Start in WfCR, same as PRs that don't require a maintainer review,
Wait for approval (as usual),
Possibly offer to "ready to merge",
And when all that's done, instead of merging it directly, wait for a maintainer to merge after eye-balling whatever required a maintainer in the first place.
More notes:
The ready-to-merge offer will be different of course, saying that it just require a maintainer to merge.
If no reviews come in, then it will stale out as usual (which means moving to the maintainers too).
A related option: do the same for no-other-owner PRs, with a note saying that it will end up in the maintainer queue after a while. This should encourage people looking for additional maintainers, which should reduce the number of maintainer-required work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(This was suggested a while ago by @andrewbranch.)
PRs that currently go to "Need Maintainer Review" can all be "blessed away" from it, making them (usually) go to "Waiting for Code Reviews". As another step towards more self-managing, it could instead do the following with these PRs:
More notes:
The ready-to-merge offer will be different of course, saying that it just require a maintainer to merge.
If no reviews come in, then it will stale out as usual (which means moving to the maintainers too).
A related option: do the same for no-other-owner PRs, with a note saying that it will end up in the maintainer queue after a while. This should encourage people looking for additional maintainers, which should reduce the number of maintainer-required work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: