Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Running get_coverage() and rebuilding prompt. #232

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

EmbeddedDevops1
Copy link
Collaborator

@EmbeddedDevops1 EmbeddedDevops1 commented Nov 22, 2024

PR Type

bug_fix, enhancement


Description

  • Replaced the run_coverage() method with get_coverage() to obtain detailed information about failed test runs, language, test framework, and coverage report.
  • Introduced a call to build_prompt() to rebuild the prompt using the detailed coverage information.
  • Improved the logic for handling test coverage data, ensuring more accurate and informative prompt rebuilding.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
CoverAgent.py
Enhance coverage handling and prompt rebuilding logic       

cover_agent/CoverAgent.py

  • Replaced run_coverage() with get_coverage() to obtain detailed
    coverage information.
  • Added a call to build_prompt() with the results from get_coverage().
  • Improved handling of test coverage data and prompt rebuilding.
  • +2/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Error Handling
    The get_coverage() call returns multiple values but there's no error handling if any of these values are None or invalid. This could lead to runtime errors when building the prompt.

    Code Smell
    The magic number 100 used in coverage percentage calculation should be extracted as a named constant for better maintainability and readability.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Add validation for returned values from external method calls to prevent potential runtime errors

    Store and check the return values from get_coverage() for potential errors or None
    values before using them in build_prompt() to prevent runtime errors.

    cover_agent/CoverAgent.py [208-209]

    -failed_test_runs, language, test_framework, coverage_report = self.test_validator.get_coverage()
    -self.test_gen.build_prompt(failed_test_runs, language, test_framework, coverage_report)
    +results = self.test_validator.get_coverage()
    +if all(result is not None for result in results):
    +    failed_test_runs, language, test_framework, coverage_report = results
    +    self.test_gen.build_prompt(failed_test_runs, language, test_framework, coverage_report)
    +else:
    +    self.logger.error("Failed to get valid coverage results")
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion addresses an important defensive programming practice by validating the return values from get_coverage() before using them. This prevents potential runtime errors that could occur if any of the returned values are None or invalid.

    8

    💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    @EmbeddedDevops1 EmbeddedDevops1 merged commit f768030 into main Nov 22, 2024
    6 checks passed
    @EmbeddedDevops1 EmbeddedDevops1 deleted the hotfix/run-coverage branch November 22, 2024 17:15
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant