You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a clinician I want to detect as many true SVs as possible. After the update planned in balsamic 16.0.0 we're going to have a lot more single-end reads in our bam files due to the UMI collapse implemented here: #1358
I opened an issue for the package to be uploaded to Bioconda: SciLifeLab/TIDDIT#119.
I reviewed the errors and it seems there's a bug in the TIDDIT code. However, I'm not very familiar with Bioconda recipes. I also encountered a similar error with Cython when attempting to install it from scratch.
Need
As a clinician I want to detect as many true SVs as possible. After the update planned in balsamic 16.0.0 we're going to have a lot more single-end reads in our bam files due to the UMI collapse implemented here: #1358
In a a recent version of TIDDIT there has been an update that greatly improves the use of single end reads in SV variant calling: https://github.com/SciLifeLab/TIDDIT/releases
It seems then like an opportune time to update TIDDIT as a part of release 16.
Suggested approach
Update TIDDIT and implement in release 16.
Test the new version in the new deduplicate with UMIs branch: #1358
Considered alternatives
No response
Deviation
No response
System requirements assessed
Requirements affected by this story
No response
Risk assessment needed
Risk assessment
No response
SOUPs
No response
Can be closed when
No response
Blockers
No response
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: