You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm using SCOPE v1.73 to implement a split simulation of PSI and PSII fluorescence. However, I have some problems in changing the parameter of the fraction of chlorophyll-absorbed energy allocated to PSII (β2).
Where should I set the β2 parameter?
I think the factor 0.5 is used in the formulas for calculating the forward (Mf) and backward (Mb) scattering fluorescence matrices in fluspect_B_CX.m because the forward and backward scattering fluorescence are equal, so each is taken as 1/2. How should I understand the comment ("Other factor .5 deleted, since these are the complete efficiencies for either PSI or PSII, not a linear combination") in front of the formulas? What is the coefficient of 0.5 that was deleted, and is the β2 parameter reflected in these two formulas? % Other factor .5 deleted, since these are the complete efficiencies for either PSI or PSII, not a linear combination [MfI, MbI] = deal(fqe(1) * ((.5*phiI( Iwlf))*eps) * kChl(Iwle)'.*sigmoid); [MfII, MbII] = deal(fqe(2) * ((.5*phiII(Iwlf))*eps) * kChl(Iwle)'.*sigmoid);
aPAR_Cab_eta in the formula for calculating total fluorescence (Femtot) in SCOPE.m represents green ePAR * relative fluorescence emission efficiency, is the β2 parameter involved here? rad.Femtot = 1E3*(leafbio.fqe(2)* optipar.phiII(spectral.IwlF) * fluxes.aPAR_Cab_eta +leafbio.fqe(1)* optipar.phiI(spectral.IwlF) * fluxes.aPAR_Cab);
Looking forward to your answer! Many thanks!
Best regards,
Mengjia Qi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear SCOPE developers,
I'm using SCOPE v1.73 to implement a split simulation of PSI and PSII fluorescence. However, I have some problems in changing the parameter of the fraction of chlorophyll-absorbed energy allocated to PSII (β2).
Where should I set the β2 parameter?
I think the factor 0.5 is used in the formulas for calculating the forward (Mf) and backward (Mb) scattering fluorescence matrices in fluspect_B_CX.m because the forward and backward scattering fluorescence are equal, so each is taken as 1/2. How should I understand the comment ("Other factor .5 deleted, since these are the complete efficiencies for either PSI or PSII, not a linear combination") in front of the formulas? What is the coefficient of 0.5 that was deleted, and is the β2 parameter reflected in these two formulas?
% Other factor .5 deleted, since these are the complete efficiencies for either PSI or PSII, not a linear combination [MfI, MbI] = deal(fqe(1) * ((.5*phiI( Iwlf))*eps) * kChl(Iwle)'.*sigmoid); [MfII, MbII] = deal(fqe(2) * ((.5*phiII(Iwlf))*eps) * kChl(Iwle)'.*sigmoid);
aPAR_Cab_eta in the formula for calculating total fluorescence (Femtot) in SCOPE.m represents green ePAR * relative fluorescence emission efficiency, is the β2 parameter involved here?
rad.Femtot = 1E3*(leafbio.fqe(2)* optipar.phiII(spectral.IwlF) * fluxes.aPAR_Cab_eta +leafbio.fqe(1)* optipar.phiI(spectral.IwlF) * fluxes.aPAR_Cab);
Looking forward to your answer! Many thanks!
Best regards,
Mengjia Qi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: