Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove the condition that uses max_token to reduce the context #5269

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

QAbot-zh
Copy link

@QAbot-zh QAbot-zh commented Aug 14, 2024

💻 变更类型 | Change Type

  • feat
  • fix
  • refactor
  • perf
  • style
  • test
  • docs
  • ci
  • chore
  • build

🔀 变更说明 | Description of Change

如今 max_tokens 已经不再作为上下文的限制变量了,应该回归它的本意(单次最大回复),移除通过该判断条件,仅通过上下文消息数量来管理上下文,方便用户理解相关的设置,避免长文对话时以为大模型“失去”记忆。

📝 补充信息 | Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced message retrieval by removing the token limit, allowing for more messages to be processed and displayed in the chat.
  • Potential Impacts

    • Users may experience a richer chat history but should be aware of possible performance implications with significantly larger message arrays.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 14, 2024

@QAbot-zh is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes in the useChatStore function of app/store/chat.ts shift the message retrieval process by removing the token limit on recent messages. This allows for a more extensive selection of messages to be included, enhancing functionality. However, it may introduce performance considerations due to potential increases in the volume of messages processed.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/store/chat.ts Modified useChatStore to remove token count constraints on message retrieval, allowing more messages.

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where messages flow,
With more to share, our chats will grow!
No token limits, all voices can sing,
A rabbit's joy in the changes we bring!
Hop, skip, and jump, let the stories unfold,
In the world of chat, new adventures are told! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between edb92f7 and 3939ff4.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/store/chat.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
app/store/chat.ts (2)

497-497: Commenting out maxTokenThreshold is appropriate.

The removal of maxTokenThreshold aligns with the PR objective to stop using max_tokens for context management.


503-503: Removing token limit in loop condition is consistent with objectives.

The loop now includes more messages without the token limit, aligning with the PR's goals. However, verify performance implications due to potential increases in message volume.

Copy link
Contributor

Your build has completed!

Preview deployment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant