Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify leak subtraction strategy between fluoride and non-fluoride data... #8

Open
hilaryh opened this issue Jun 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@hilaryh
Copy link
Contributor

hilaryh commented Jun 26, 2024

Make sure Chon's strategy is what is now happening in pcpostprocess

@mirams
Copy link
Member

mirams commented Aug 8, 2024

Need to check and agree the actual strategy to use @joeyshuttleworth @chonlei @mirams . Particularly with regard to whether the leak subtraction has any constraint on giving negative currents in the +40mV step after the leak ramp.

@mirams
Copy link
Member

mirams commented Aug 8, 2024

Thinking about it, might be a very nice thing to repeat Chon's Biophys 1 and 2 fits with Joey's slightly different leak subtraction, assuming it is the only thing that's changed. Then we can see if things become obviously better or worse. Although we probably put it in because it helped!

But because we only have the Roche traces in CSV would need #1 to be finished first.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants