You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would it be possible to do Bayesian inference over $(\phi, q)$ rather than just $\phi$?
Potentially accepting some prior over $q$?
This could easily be extended in the case of sequential Monte Carlo Bayesian inference, I wonder how it could be done in terms of exact (Fourier) or moment-matching (von Mises) - perhaps could make an independence approximation $p(\phi, q) = p(\phi) p(q)$.
The nice thing is that this could be done without additional quantum overhead (i.e. same number of shots per update).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Would it be possible to do Bayesian inference over$(\phi, q)$ rather than just $\phi$ ?
Potentially accepting some prior over$q$ ?
This could easily be extended in the case of sequential Monte Carlo Bayesian inference, I wonder how it could be done in terms of exact (Fourier) or moment-matching (von Mises) - perhaps could make an independence approximation$p(\phi, q) = p(\phi) p(q)$ .
The nice thing is that this could be done without additional quantum overhead (i.e. same number of shots per
update
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: