You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to express my deep appreciation for the significant contribution your work has made to our community. It has been an invaluable resource for me.
I have encountered a question regarding the calibration set you chose when trying to figure out the code. I hope you can offer some suggestions.
In your implementation, when pruning LLM with FLAP, the calibration set is chosen as WikiText-v2, as shown in this line.
If I understand correctly, comparing the PPL on WikiText-v2 with previous work might be misleading, as previous pruning methods were not trained on WikiText-v2. Could you please confirm this?
Can you specify the calibration set you choose when you report the result in your paper? I can not find this in the paper.
Thanks for your attention, and I hope to hear from you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear authors,
I would like to express my deep appreciation for the significant contribution your work has made to our community. It has been an invaluable resource for me.
I have encountered a question regarding the calibration set you chose when trying to figure out the code. I hope you can offer some suggestions.
In your implementation, when pruning LLM with FLAP, the calibration set is chosen as WikiText-v2, as shown in this line.
If I understand correctly, comparing the PPL on WikiText-v2 with previous work might be misleading, as previous pruning methods were not trained on WikiText-v2. Could you please confirm this?
Can you specify the calibration set you choose when you report the result in your paper? I can not find this in the paper.
Thanks for your attention, and I hope to hear from you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: