You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'd like to see how/where my coins travelled. A visual representation that shows the individual addresses (grouped by wallet name / description) and also gives information about the transactions between them would be great. Having an idea of foreign addresses connected to my owned addresses would also be helpful.
Describe the solution you'd like
BitBook should provide a file I could render using GraphViz (dotty). The addresses should be clustered by description. Transactions should be edges between nodes, where the thickness is derived from the transacted value (logarithmic scale). Fees should also be included, but not as separate edges. Foreign addresses should also be included, but only if they are connected to an owned address. Lightning Channels (opened or opened&closed) should get a distinct representation. For addresses with a non-zero balance, the balance should be included in the visualization (possibly with a different representation depending on the amount).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'd like to see how/where my coins travelled. A visual representation that shows the individual addresses (grouped by wallet name / description) and also gives information about the transactions between them would be great. Having an idea of foreign addresses connected to my owned addresses would also be helpful.
Describe the solution you'd like
BitBook should provide a file I could render using GraphViz (dotty). The addresses should be clustered by description. Transactions should be edges between nodes, where the thickness is derived from the transacted value (logarithmic scale). Fees should also be included, but not as separate edges. Foreign addresses should also be included, but only if they are connected to an owned address. Lightning Channels (opened or opened&closed) should get a distinct representation. For addresses with a non-zero balance, the balance should be included in the visualization (possibly with a different representation depending on the amount).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: