You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I find the the way clusters are identified will inevitably lead to inaccuracies since pools tickers are not unique and anyone can register a new pool with the ticker of an existing pool.
I strongly recommend moving to a system where pools in clusters are identified by their unique poolId, this can be in HEX.
I can assist in the migration if you like :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @leo42, thanks a lot for raising this point. As I mentioned in #133, I agree with you that this is something we need to change. @dimkarakostas and I will talk about it and see how we can fit this task in our backlog, but in the meantime you are most welcome to propose specific changes yourself (I just changed my notifications settings, so I should be more responsive from now on!)
As you can see Balance Analitycts offers free access but for Cexplorer you should request access and provide attribution to use their API.
Both lists are manually maintained and can be use as a start point or source of data for a new clustering process.
My Python is a bit rusty but it seems that if you craft new mappings "mapping_information/cardano_preprocessing" where all the files use the poolId as the primary identifier should be a good start
I find the the way clusters are identified will inevitably lead to inaccuracies since pools tickers are not unique and anyone can register a new pool with the ticker of an existing pool.
I strongly recommend moving to a system where pools in clusters are identified by their unique poolId, this can be in HEX.
I can assist in the migration if you like :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: