Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update typescript eslint and make changes accordingly #534

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

yoannfleurydev
Copy link
Member

@yoannfleurydev yoannfleurydev commented Oct 2, 2024

Describe your changes

  • update TypeScript ESLint
  • update usage accordingly

Checklist

  • I performed a self review of my code
  • I ensured that everything is written in English
  • I tested the feature or fix on my local environment
  • I ran the pnpm storybook command and everything is working
  • If applicable, I updated the translations for english and french files
    (If you cannot update the french language, just let us know in the PR description)
  • If applicable, I updated the README.md
  • If applicable, I created a PR or an issue on the documentation repository
  • If applicable, I’m sure that my feature or my component is mobile first and available correctly on desktop

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated error handling in user authentication procedures for improved clarity.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified error handling in various functions to streamline logging and error management.
  • Documentation

    • Updated comments in multiple files for clarity regarding ESLint rules.
  • Chores

    • Incremented project version to 2.0.0 and updated Node.js engine requirement.
    • Updated @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin dependency version.

@yoannfleurydev yoannfleurydev self-assigned this Oct 2, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 2, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
start-ui ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 2, 2024 1:42pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to several files within the project start-ui-web. Key changes involve version increments in package.json, modifications to error handling and comments in various TypeScript files, and a refactor for improved readability in a hook. The changes aim to streamline error handling and enhance code clarity without altering existing functionalities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
package.json Version updated to 2.0.0; Node.js requirement set to >=20; @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin updated from 7.16.0 to 8.8.0.
src/components/DayPicker/hooks/useDayPickerPopperManagement.ts Refactored togglePopper function for clarity; no changes to functionality or control flow.
src/components/Form/FormFieldError.tsx Updated comment in FormFieldErrorProps type definition; no changes to functionality or logic.
src/components/Icons/svgr.config.js Changed ESLint directive from @typescript-eslint/no-var-requires to @typescript-eslint/no-require-imports.
src/lib/utils.ts Updated ESLint comment in fixedForwardRef function; no changes to function signature or logic.
src/server/config/auth.ts Simplified error handling in validateCode and deleteUsedCode functions; no changes to overall structure or logic.
src/server/routers/auth.tsx Simplified error handling in loginValidate and registerValidate procedures; updated user creation/updating logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant AuthRouter
    participant AuthService

    User->>AuthRouter: Login/Register Request
    AuthRouter->>AuthService: Validate User
    AuthService->>AuthService: Handle Errors (simplified)
    AuthService->>AuthRouter: Return Response
    AuthRouter->>User: Response with Status
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/lib/utils.ts (1)

4-4: LGTM! Consider using a named type instead of {}

The update to the ESLint disable comment is appropriate and aligns with the PR objective of updating the TypeScript ESLint configuration. The new rule @typescript-eslint/no-empty-object-type is more specific to the usage in this function.

To improve type safety and remove the need for the ESLint disable comment, consider using a named type instead of {}. For example:

type EmptyObject = Record<string, never>;

export function fixedForwardRef<T, P = EmptyObject>(
  // ... rest of the function
)

This change would make the code more explicit and remove the need for the ESLint disable comment.

src/server/config/auth.ts (2)

146-148: Consider logging error details for debugging purposes

The simplification of error handling in this catch block aligns with the PR's objective of updating TypeScript ESLint configuration. However, removing specific error logging might make future debugging more challenging.

Consider using a more informative error logging approach that doesn't violate linting rules. For example:

} catch (error: unknown) {
  ctx.logger.error('Failed to update token attempts', { error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error) });
}

This approach logs the error message without using the error object directly, which should satisfy linting rules while still providing valuable debugging information.


171-173: Maintain consistency in error handling and consider logging error details

This change is consistent with the previous modification in the validateCode function, likely addressing the same linting rule. The log level change from 'error' to 'warn' suggests this failure is considered less critical.

For consistency and improved debugging, consider using a similar approach as suggested for the validateCode function:

} catch (error: unknown) {
  ctx.logger.warn('Failed to delete the used token', { error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error) });
}

This maintains the 'warn' log level while providing more detailed error information for debugging purposes.

src/server/routers/auth.tsx (2)

Line range hint 177-182: Consider logging the specific error for debugging purposes

The simplification of the error handling improves code readability and provides a consistent user-facing error message, which is good for security. However, losing specific error information might make debugging more challenging in production environments.

Consider logging the specific error while still throwing a generic error to the client:

 } catch (error) {
   ctx.logger.warn('Failed to update the user, probably not enabled');
+  ctx.logger.error('Specific error:', error);
   throw new TRPCError({
     code: 'UNAUTHORIZED',
     message: 'Failed to authenticate the user',
   });
 }

This way, you maintain the security benefit of not exposing detailed errors to the client while preserving valuable debug information in your logs.


Line range hint 373-378: Maintain consistency with loginValidate and consider logging the specific error

The error handling simplification here is consistent with the changes made in the loginValidate procedure, which is good for maintaining code style across the codebase. However, the same consideration about losing specific error information applies here as well.

For consistency with the suggested improvement in loginValidate, consider logging the specific error:

 } catch (error) {
   ctx.logger.warn('Failed to update the user, probably already verified');
+  ctx.logger.error('Specific error:', error);
   throw new TRPCError({
     code: 'UNAUTHORIZED',
     message: 'Failed to authenticate the user',
   });
 }

This approach maintains the security benefit of not exposing detailed errors to the client while preserving valuable debug information in your logs.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 02a3188 and 22a97ea.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/components/DayPicker/hooks/useDayPickerPopperManagement.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/components/Form/FormFieldError.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/Icons/svgr.config.js (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/utils.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/server/config/auth.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/server/routers/auth.tsx (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • src/components/Form/FormFieldError.tsx
  • src/components/Icons/svgr.config.js
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/lib/utils.ts (2)

Line range hint 1-10: Overall, the changes look good with room for improvement

The update to the ESLint rule aligns with the PR objectives, and the fixedForwardRef function implementation is correct. However, there are opportunities to improve type safety and remove the need for ESLint disabling comments.

Consider implementing the suggested improvements to enhance the overall quality and type safety of the code.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 5-5: Don't use '{}' as a type.

Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".

(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)


Line range hint 5-10: Function implementation looks correct, but consider improving type safety

The fixedForwardRef function serves as a utility for creating forward ref components with proper typing, which is a good practice. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The use of ExplicitAny in the type assertion might compromise type safety. Consider using a more specific type if possible.

  2. The default type for P is an empty object ({}), which is why the ESLint rule needed to be disabled. As suggested earlier, using a named type like EmptyObject = Record<string, never> could improve readability and type safety.

Here's a potential improvement to enhance type safety:

type EmptyObject = Record<string, never>;

export function fixedForwardRef<T, P = EmptyObject>(
  render: (props: P, ref: React.Ref<T>) => React.ReactNode
): React.ForwardRefExoticComponent<P & React.RefAttributes<T>> {
  return forwardRef(render);
}

This change removes the need for ExplicitAny and provides a more precise return type. It also eliminates the need for the ESLint disable comment.

To ensure this change doesn't break existing usage, let's search for all occurrences of fixedForwardRef:

Please review the results to confirm that this change won't cause any issues in the existing codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Type Safety Improvement for fixedForwardRef Function

The proposed changes to fixedForwardRef enhance type safety by removing ExplicitAny and specifying a more precise return type. After reviewing all usages of fixedForwardRef, the changes are safe and do not impact existing functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all usages of fixedForwardRef
rg --type typescript 'fixedForwardRef'

Length of output: 73


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all usages of fixedForwardRef
rg --type ts 'fixedForwardRef'

Length of output: 632

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 5-5: Don't use '{}' as a type.

Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".

(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)

src/components/DayPicker/hooks/useDayPickerPopperManagement.ts (1)

47-52: Improved readability and structure of togglePopper function

The refactoring of the togglePopper function from a ternary operator to an if-else structure is a positive change. This new implementation offers several benefits:

  1. Enhanced readability: The logic is now more explicit and easier to understand at a glance.
  2. Improved maintainability: The separate branches for closing and opening the popper are clearer, making future modifications easier.
  3. Potential performance improvement: The early return for the closing case can slightly optimize the function's execution.

The changes maintain the original functionality while improving the code quality.

src/server/config/auth.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-214: Summary of changes and their impact

The modifications in this file are consistent and focused on simplifying error handling in catch blocks. These changes align with the PR objective of updating TypeScript ESLint configuration and likely address linting rules about unused variables.

While the changes do simplify the code, they come at the cost of reduced error information logging. This trade-off between code simplicity and debugging capability is worth considering.

The changes are approved, but consider implementing the suggested improvements in error logging to maintain a balance between code cleanliness and debugging effectiveness.

To ensure these changes haven't impacted other parts of the codebase, please run the following verification script:

This script will help identify if similar error handling patterns exist elsewhere in the codebase, which might benefit from consistent updates.

✅ Verification successful

To identify the correct file type specifier for TypeScript in your environment, please run the following script:

This will help determine if "typescript" is a recognized type or if an alternative specifier should be used.


To accurately search for similar error handling patterns in other TypeScript files, please run the following updated script:


To successfully search for similar error handling patterns in other TypeScript files, please run the updated script below, which correctly specifies the TypeScript file type:


Verification Successful

The error handling patterns in other TypeScript files are consistent with the changes made in src/server/config/auth.ts. No issues were found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar error handling patterns in other files

# Test: Search for catch blocks with console.error or logger.error
rg --type typescript -e 'catch \(.+\) \{' -e '(console|logger)\.(error|warn)' --glob '!src/server/config/auth.ts'

Length of output: 150


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all available file types in ripgrep

rg --type-list

Length of output: 4821


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar error handling patterns in other files

# Test: Search for catch blocks with console.error or logger.error
rg --type ts --type tsx -e 'catch \(.+\) \{' -e '(console|logger)\.(error|warn)' --glob '!src/server/config/auth.ts'

Length of output: 146


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar error handling patterns in other TypeScript files

# Test: Search for catch blocks with console.error or logger.error
rg --type ts -e 'catch \(.+\) \{' -e '(console|logger)\.(error|warn)' --glob '!src/server/config/auth.ts'

Length of output: 2216

package.json (1)

128-128: Approve the update to @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin, but verify its impact.

The update from version 7.16.0 to 8.8.0 of @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin is a significant change that aligns with the PR's objective. This major version update may introduce breaking changes and new features.

Please ensure the following:

  1. Verify that the project's ESLint configuration has been updated to accommodate any changes required by this new version.
  2. Review the changelog for @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin 8.x.x to identify any breaking changes that may affect the project.
  3. Check for new features or rule updates that could enhance the project's linting capabilities.

To assist with this verification, you can run the following command to check for any new or changed rules:

This script will help identify any potential issues or areas that may need attention due to the update.

src/server/routers/auth.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-394: Overall assessment of changes in auth.tsx

The changes in this file are consistent with the PR objectives of updating TypeScript ESLint and making necessary adjustments. The error handling simplification in both loginValidate and registerValidate procedures improves code consistency and readability.

However, it's important to note that while these changes enhance security by not exposing detailed error information to clients, they might impact debugging capabilities in production environments. The suggested improvements to log specific errors internally would help maintain a balance between security and debuggability.

These changes are approved with the suggested minor improvements for error logging. The modifications align well with modern TypeScript practices and maintain the overall functionality of the authentication router.

@ivan-dalmet ivan-dalmet merged commit ff723c0 into master Oct 3, 2024
8 checks passed
@ivan-dalmet ivan-dalmet deleted the feat/update-typescript-eslint branch October 3, 2024 08:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants