-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UEFI: use syslinux #148
Comments
Why not ugly solution for GRUB? Ugly doesn't mean bad, no? Grub has more personalization possibilities and it's newer so why to use Cheers W dniu 09.06.2015 o 15:25, BoySka pisze:
|
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:51:57PM -0700, AreYouLoco? wrote:
well, this kind of ugly solution is hard to maintain, and also has some
I don't think that syslinux is older, or less maintained, than GRUB.
thanks in advance for your help! It will surely be needed. |
FYI it's basically impossible, in the current state of things, to have syslinux work both for 32-bit and 64-bit UEFI on the same device if installed in the EFI fallback boot loader directory (the So, FYI the Tails WIP branch that adds 32-bit UEFI support uses GRUB2 (while for legacy BIOS and 64-bit UEFI, we use syslinux). This is likely to be merged in the next few months, but on the longer term, I'm starting to consider switching to GRUB2 for everything. |
At the moment we have a ugly binary grub file in order to support UEFI.
This is really ugly, and also difficult to maintain.
We should move to use syslinux both for bios and uefi boot.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: