You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
FocusE-ComplEx: Question on using numeric edge weight attributes - prediction performance (MRR) and embeddings are very similar between models with and without edge weights
#268
Open
lanhaz opened this issue
Nov 16, 2022
· 0 comments
Ampligraph-Complex-FocusE (Version 1.4.0) - Support for Numeric Literals on Edges
I am comparing 2 different ComplEx Models, one that uses model.fit(X, focusE_numeric_edge_values=X_edge_values) with edge weights and one without edge weights using model.fit(X)
COMPARING Predictions (MRR) & Embeddings between the following two ComplEx models:
(1) With Edge-weights AND
(2) WithOUT Edge-weights]
Upon comparing models (1) & (2), the following behavior is observed:
Quite Similar Performance (eg. MRR / MR / Hits@N) - BUT most likely due to the dataset size for this example.
Very Similar Embeddings, meaning embedding differences between (1) & (2) exhibiting relative tolerance ~ +/-[0.005]
Most importantly, small embedding differences when using following cases for edge-weights:
3a. all edge weights = 0's (using np.zeros)
3b. all edge weights = 1's (using np.ones)
3c. all edge weights assigned to random weights between [0,1] using np.random.rand
When using complEx+FocusE algorithms to add Edge-weights, I assume performance / embeddings should NOT be approximately the same when comparing these TWO models (1) vs (2).
Expected Behavior
After trying various edge-weights (eg. focusE_numeric_edge_values = {from Toy Example, OR all ones, OR all zeros, OR random numbers between [0,1]}), I was expecting the Embeddings between the models WITH edge-weights to be different from the models WithOUT.
In summary, across all variations of edge weights for these experiments, the MRR was very similar and the embeddings were also in terms of their relative differences compared to model trained without using edge weights.
Steps to Reproduce
Please kindly replicate the toy example using following code:
Here are the Steps needed to reproduce this issue for ComplEx+FocusE Edge weightings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lanhaz
changed the title
FocusE-ComplEx: Issue found using numeric edge weight attributes - Why are predictions (MRR) and embeddings NOT changing?
FocusE-ComplEx: Question on using numeric edge weight attributes - Why is prediction performance (MRR) and embeddings so similar?
Nov 22, 2022
lanhaz
changed the title
FocusE-ComplEx: Question on using numeric edge weight attributes - Why is prediction performance (MRR) and embeddings so similar?
FocusE-ComplEx: Question on using numeric edge weight attributes - prediction performance (MRR) and embeddings are very similar between models with and without edge weights
Nov 22, 2022
Description
Ampligraph-Complex-FocusE (Version 1.4.0) - Support for Numeric Literals on Edges
I am comparing 2 different ComplEx Models, one that uses model.fit(X, focusE_numeric_edge_values=X_edge_values) with edge weights and one without edge weights using model.fit(X)
I'm following the Toy Example provided on AmpliGraph documentation page (see below)
https://docs.ampligraph.org/en/1.4.0/generated/ampligraph.latent_features.ComplEx.html#focuse-complex
Actual Behavior
COMPARING Predictions (MRR) & Embeddings between the following two ComplEx models:
(1) With Edge-weights AND
(2) WithOUT Edge-weights]
Upon comparing models (1) & (2), the following behavior is observed:
3a. all edge weights = 0's (using np.zeros)
3b. all edge weights = 1's (using np.ones)
3c. all edge weights assigned to random weights between [0,1] using np.random.rand
When using complEx+FocusE algorithms to add Edge-weights, I assume performance / embeddings should NOT be approximately the same when comparing these TWO models (1) vs (2).
Expected Behavior
After trying various edge-weights (eg. focusE_numeric_edge_values = {from Toy Example, OR all ones, OR all zeros, OR random numbers between [0,1]}), I was expecting the Embeddings between the models WITH edge-weights to be different from the models WithOUT.
In summary, across all variations of edge weights for these experiments, the MRR was very similar and the embeddings were also in terms of their relative differences compared to model trained without using edge weights.
Steps to Reproduce
Please kindly replicate the toy example using following code:
Here are the Steps needed to reproduce this issue for ComplEx+FocusE Edge weightings.
========================
===========================
<-- PYTHON CODE FILE -->
PHXA-11415-Log-ISSUE-Ampligraph-ComplEx-FocusE__pythonCODE.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: