We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This will allow a faster development for the frontend. Vitejs is faster, and also the default webbrowser won't be launch each time the tauri dev command is started. Some pros and cons on the following article https://blog.logrocket.com/vite-3-vs-create-react-app-comparison-migration-guide/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd definitely support this. Would be good. Could also perhaps use the default tauri app layout when doing the refactor?
There's unused folders like app/build and icons, along with a duplicated node_modules which can all go in the process.
app/build
icons
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
This will allow a faster development for the frontend. Vitejs is faster, and also the default webbrowser won't be launch each time the tauri dev command is started.
Some pros and cons on the following article
https://blog.logrocket.com/vite-3-vs-create-react-app-comparison-migration-guide/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: