CMI 5 Subgroup Meeting Notes – Mar 8th, 2024

cmi5 Subgroup Meeting Notes– Mar 8th, 2024

Attendee List

• Andy Johnson
• Bill McDonald
• Andrew Chemey
• Florian Tolk
• Christopher Thompson
• Franklin Ludgood
• Jim Taite
• Megan Bohland
• Simon Hsu
• Yifei Dong

Notes

---

The group reviewed the issues backlog to identify possible updates for the pending IEEE cmi5 specification.

[Issue #395 - Should we require the triggering AU/Block Activity to be in the contextActivities for "Satisfied" statements?]](https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/issues/395)

• What statement triggered it?
• Actual Id for Object that Satisfaction is referring to?
• **An Array of all Objects (and/or all satisfying statements) that contributed to the Satisfaction event
  • Id’s of activities or blocks
• Best Practice: GET query with related activities set to “true” to look up Satisfaction Statements.
• Other related issue – LMS issues Satisfied Statement for AU’s - https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/issues/567

Best Practice #13 – LMS create “satisfied” statements for AU’s.

It is recommended that the LMS create a cmi5 “allowed” statement (with a satisfied verb) when an AU has met its moveOn criteria. The statement should also include the same AU activityId used in cmi5 defined statements.

(Re-Review) Issue #739 Images in course structure

• Reference A metadata spec – or provide a block?
• Why not just extend course structure? (since there so many possibilities for metadata)
• Possible Best Practice: Create a generic course metadata block?
• Define Keys for most common metadata standards?

---

All Previous cmi5 Meeting Minutes/Notes

https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/wiki

cmi5 on GitHub:

http://aicc.github.io/CMI-5_Spec_Current/