Skip to content

Issues: AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

20 Open 326 Closed
20 Open 326 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

cmi5 Adopter
#814 opened Mar 15, 2024 by r-kraemer
cmi5 Adopter
#813 opened Mar 15, 2024 by r-kraemer
Images in course structure Table Discussion
#739 opened Jul 27, 2021 by thomasturrell
2
languagePreference would be much easier to handle as an array Defer Until Next Major Release IEEE_pre_review_1
#731 opened Jul 2, 2021 by brianjmiller
5
What is the best practice for when to send completed or passed statements? Add To Best Practices Document
#715 opened Jun 9, 2021 by thomasturrell
5
13.0 Section as Requirements Further Discussion Needed IEEE_pre_review_1
#637 opened Apr 20, 2021 by brianjmiller
2
9.3.9 - SHOULD NOT issue multiple "Satsified" statements Defer Until Next Major Release IEEE_pre_review_1 Reviewed for next Draft
#630 opened Apr 15, 2021 by brianjmiller
2
8.2.3.2 Allowed error-code values Defer Until Next Major Release IEEE_pre_review_1 Reviewed for next Draft
#624 opened Apr 15, 2021 by brianjmiller
3
8.2.2 auth-token definition duplicate requirements Consensus and Needing PR IEEE_pre_review_1
#622 opened Apr 15, 2021 by brianjmiller
3
8.1/8.2 - Duplicate requirements for fetch Consensus and Needing PR IEEE_pre_review_1
#620 opened Apr 15, 2021 by brianjmiller
2
entitlementKey data type Add To Best Practices Document IEEE_pre_review_1
#614 opened Mar 19, 2021 by cars10
5
Make AU support of moveOn criteria at runtime mandatory IEEE_pre_review_1 new_feature_consideration
#605 opened Jun 13, 2020 by MrBillMcDonald
5
Add cmi5 Objectives to LMS.LaunchData State document Further Discussion Needed IEEE_pre_review_1
#589 opened Nov 4, 2018 by MrBillMcDonald
2
Prohibition of AU using LMS specific Verbs Defer Until Next Major Release IEEE_pre_review_1 Reviewed for next Draft
#576 opened May 18, 2018 by MrBillMcDonald
Recommend Satisfied statement upon meeting moveOn criteria for an AU Defer Until Next Major Release IEEE_pre_review_1 Reviewed for next Draft
#567 opened Oct 4, 2017 by cawerkenthin
7
Registration Id Requirement for All Statement Contexts Defer Until Next Major Release IEEE_pre_review_1 Reviewed for next Draft
#565 opened Aug 20, 2017 by MrBillMcDonald
2
Section 8.2.3.1 Duplicate call to fetch URL. (Change SHOULD to MUST) Defer Until Next Major Release IEEE_pre_review_1 Reviewed for next Draft
#559 opened Jul 7, 2017 by MrBillMcDonald
7
May an LMS change moveOn for a person taking it "during" a registration? Defer Until Next Major Release Further Discussion Needed IEEE_pre_review_1 Reviewed for next Draft
#552 opened Jun 9, 2017 by fugu13
8
langstring not well specified IEEE_pre_review_1 Recommended Best Practice
#543 opened Apr 28, 2017 by brianjmiller
2
Should we require the triggering AU/Block Activity to be in the contextActivities for "Satisfied" statements? Defer Until Next Major Release IEEE_pre_review_1 Reviewed for next Draft
#395 opened Jan 26, 2016 by brianjmiller
3
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.